CSR report and co: when appearance and reality don't match 

I only see extremely successful people and companies on LinkedIn who are constantly posting about themselves and their achievements: "best place to work", "climate neutral", women are promoted, minorities are of course integrated and there are reports about crises that have been overcome (another success); even ADHD and depression are chic (except presumably for those who actually suffer badly from it); all seemingly perfect people and companies. The bigger the company, the louder and more comprehensively the shop window is decorated. Who can believe that? 

Corporate social responsibility has become an important, if not the selection criterion for customers and potential employees. It's no wonder that companies and corporate leaders, especially via social media, are putting these societal, social and economic standards on their banners as colorfully as possible and then displaying them to great public effect. 

Of course, the public image, i.e. what is claimed on the website, in advertising, in social media, in presentations, in brochures, town hall meetings and press reports, should be a little nicer than the reality. Rattling around is part of the business, and a little "fake-it" is ok if the "make-it" follows reliably and promptly.

However, from my observations, a veritable hysteria has set in here to present oneself and the company in an ever better light. As a result, there is often hardly any time left for successful and sustainable implementation. Out of sheer zeal, many protagonists no longer realize how credibility is being sacrificed, while every child realizes that something is wrong. For example, when companies present themselves as eye-catching and colorful as possible as supporters or even role models during Pride Month or Equal Pay Day, but then there is no sign of diversity, equality and inclusion in the appointments to board positions.  

 

More substance than appearance

In interviews, coaching sessions and workshops with board members and management teams, especially in big corporations, I experience the reality, which is often very different. The effects of this pressure, the exhaustion of having to fulfil all these demands (and yet always having to keep up) has long since reached board level. There's hardly any time left for leadership, shaping the future or even just being able to reflect on yourself; except perhaps during family time or after 11pm?

Let's finally be honest: hardly anyone can summon up the immense energy it takes to achieve the ever more demanding figures - because these are often at odds with the CSR targets. Who is supposed to bridge this ever-widening gap and still pretend that everything is easy and effortless? Everyone seems to have a strong purpose and be in a good mood, reflect, meditate, do yoga, be vegetarian and be with their families by 6 p.m. at the latest. How can their own families and employees not become cynical when they read or hear that everything is perfect and then experience it completely differently? And this cynicism unsurprisingly leads to an erosion of trust and productivity, which is exactly what nobody can afford in these days. This is where the solution becomes the problem.

And we all know the fatal consequences when appearance and reality no longer have anything in common - we only have to remember the diesel scandal. 

 

Effectiveness instead of efficiency

In their day, Generation X managers were still successful in managing companies in terms of increasing efficiency, whereas today's managers, especially younger ones who are currently reaching the boardroom in their late 30s, want to lead a different life and see themselves exposed to different demands from society and employees. They no longer just want to pretend, but actually live all these things: Fairness, participation, appreciation, psychological security, the ability to learn and develop, clarity and predictability, compatibility of family, me-time and career, being part of a shared success story.

With heart, courage, backbone and wisdom, many managers already lead companies and their teams without making a big fuss about it, thus creating a culture of trust and personal, shared economic and social success. 

In owner-managed, medium-sized companies, there is a greater degree of freedom to focus primarily on the result rather than the effect, because they are so strong in innovation, for example, that they don't need to constantly rattle on; they downright cultivate their status as "hidden champions" in order to work in peace and with foresight. 

I would also like to see this culture in the corporate world. Less time for the shop window and compensating for eroding trust and declining quality and productivity, all energy in real and effective action. This brings air and lightness into the company; the successes generated in this way may come later than praise for good intentions, but they are achieved in a more energy-efficient way and last longer, making them more sustainable. How would that be?

 

And to bring the necessary clarity to our Leadership Consommé, here are a few simple questions:

  • Who or what does my action serve? The desired result or rather myself and my ego?
  • What behavior is incentivized in the company? Appearance or reality?

 

linie

CSR report and co: when appearance and reality don't match 

I only see extremely successful people and companies on LinkedIn who are constantly posting about themselves and their achievements: "best place to work", "climate neutral", women are promoted, minorities are of course integrated and there are reports about crises that have been overcome (another success); even ADHD and depression are chic (except presumably for those who actually suffer badly from it); all seemingly perfect people and companies. The bigger the company, the louder and more comprehensively the shop window is decorated. Who can believe that? 


more

The era of the big egos is over  

Numerous factors – such as globalization, legal regulations, changes in values and generations, as well as threats such as cybercrime – are posing not only more challenges to companies and thus management, but also more complex ones and more frequently. Unsurprisingly, digitalisation has proved to be a particularly powerful catalyst for changes that can no longer be managed, let alone shaped, by conventional thought and behaviour patterns.


more

Transformation is always a quiet process, rather than a big colorful workshop.

Which people do you need in the age of digitalization? Wolf Lotter posed this question in the September issue of brandeins. Thomas Dettling (Siemens Digital Transformation Manager) agrees:

"The organization of the knowledge society is about bringing competencies together – not playing people off against each other to stay in power."


more

Typical leadership errors in the field of digital transformation

Nowadays, many companies appear to be extremely chaotic or "lost in transformation". Business leaders are chasing current buzzwords and investing in new strategies and projects without really knowing what they should pay for. And all this just so that they can give shareholders and the public the impression of being "on track digitally".


more

Achieving successful digital transformation, requires a calm and collected mindset

Digital transformation unfolds an intensified dynamic inside a company which, together with the external dynamic, becomes increasingly powerful. The acronym VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity), which originated from the military vocabulary of the 1990s, resonates with the experience of many in times of digitalization. More and more VUCA as phenomena results in increasing uncertainty.


more

Successful digital transformation – inspiring employees

Like every change process, digital transformation also splits people within companies into different groups. And this at both a managerial and a staff level. A recent survey of large companies carried out by the digital consultancy etventure, revealed that the greatest obstacles to digital transformation are in fact  people: employees react with resistance, 50% defend existing structures.This helps to explain why 35% of companies in Germany have now made the issue a top priority, in order to make drastic decisions and, above all, to implement them. Staff need to be involved in the significance of the change.


more

Lost in Transformation

Digital transformation unfolds an intensified dynamic inside a company which, together with the external dynamic, becomes increasingly powerful. The acronym VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity), which originated from the military vocabulary of the 1990s, resonates with the experience of many in times of digitalization. The effects on our social, professional and also private life are extremely complex and interdependent, and the extent and speed of change are hard (if not impossible) to predict. People feel overwhelmed.


more

Surrounded by idiots – when employees become resistance fighters

In the April 2017 issue of brandeins , Erik Nagel, Professor of Organization at Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, talks about employee resistance: "When board members encounter resistance – for example, employees who openly rebel or subtly refuse – they often interpret it as meaning that these people have not understood what is good for them. This is based on conviction: they have to obey."


more